Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 25, 2012, 02:32:35 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
NEW MEMBER ACTIVATION TEMPORARILY DISABLED DUE TO SPAM
41574 Posts in 5129 Topics by 2407 Members
Latest Member: brittany1289
* Home Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Ciliatus.com Forums
|-+  Other Reptiles, Amphibians & Inverts
| |-+  Cousins (Other Rhacodactylus)
| | |-+  Sexable weight for garg?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Sexable weight for garg?  (Read 576 times)
Terradas
Global Moderator
Subadult
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 270



View Profile WWW
« on: February 05, 2009, 06:51:42 PM »

What weight can you accurately sex a gargoyle?

My new (tailless) little guy is 7g and it looks like he has several rows of OBVIOUS pores (no loupe, but i can see lots of pores!).

I know it can be tricky to sex these guys in general, but at this size and these signs is it possible to know for sure already?
Logged

www.rocgeckos.webs.com
Ciliatus: 3.3.3
Auriculatus: 3.3.3.2
Sarasinorum: 1.2
P. m. grandis: 0.1
P. Pictus 0.0.1
monster
Retired Breeder
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2023



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2009, 11:55:50 PM »

i have more trouble sexing the younger garg's then cresteds. the retic's with the pattern can be a pain. at 7 grams, i would still suggest a loupe.
Logged

-jULIE-
forget zoo, i'm feeding a small army.
Black Ink Reptiles
Terradas
Global Moderator
Subadult
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 270



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2009, 02:20:32 PM »

Well it's a retic and there's really no need for a loupe because there are definitely pores, I just didn't realize you could sex a garg that small!

I guess Andrew Dillpin over at Repashy says it's actually easier to sex them when they're younger. Makes sense because I was convinced my subadult female with pseudo pores was a male for the longest time, no bulge though.

Logged

www.rocgeckos.webs.com
Ciliatus: 3.3.3
Auriculatus: 3.3.3.2
Sarasinorum: 1.2
P. m. grandis: 0.1
P. Pictus 0.0.1
smith710
Retired Breeder
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1803


Matt Smith


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2009, 01:40:04 AM »

Females can actually get the dots the same as males, so unless you look at it through a loupe, I wouldn't say it's a male yet.  They can be fairly hard to sex because of this.  You have to look at see if they are actually pores, or if they are just little dimples.
Logged

Matt Smith
Terradas
Global Moderator
Subadult
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 270



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2009, 12:06:48 PM »

Even at this young age the pores I see are DISTINCTLY different from the pseudo-pores my female has.

I'll see if I can get a picture tonight, the little guy is usually pretty calm because he must think I only take him out to feed him!
Logged

www.rocgeckos.webs.com
Ciliatus: 3.3.3
Auriculatus: 3.3.3.2
Sarasinorum: 1.2
P. m. grandis: 0.1
P. Pictus 0.0.1
Terradas
Global Moderator
Subadult
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 270



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2009, 09:48:23 AM »

No luck with the pics, my camera is just not cooperating!!

However, I was able to count FIVE distinct rows of pores with no loupe on this 7g gecko!
Logged

www.rocgeckos.webs.com
Ciliatus: 3.3.3
Auriculatus: 3.3.3.2
Sarasinorum: 1.2
P. m. grandis: 0.1
P. Pictus 0.0.1
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!